JUDGEMENT
APARESH KUMAR SINGH, J. -
(1.) BY way of this interlocutory application the applicants have sought to substitute themselves as legal heirs and sons of the original petitioner, Smt. Brijshantimani, who was the widow of the
employee late, Dr. Surendra Sinha, who had moved this application for payment of family pension
to the petitioner on the basis of revised pay scale. It is stated in the instant interlocutory application
that the petitioner has died on 2nd September, 2010, leaving behind her two sons, namely,
Krishna Kumar Singh and Arjun Kumar Singh and three daughters, namely, Madhvi Singh, Mridula
Singh and Maruti Singh. Photocopy of the death certificate of the original petitioner is annexed as
Annexure -'A' to the instant interlocutory application as well. It is asserted that they are legally
entitled to receive the arrear amounts of the revised family pension, which were due to the
petitioner i.e. their mother.
(2.) LEARNED counsel for the respondents have no objection to the instant prayer.
Accordingly, the instant interlocutory application is allowed and the applicants named in para 2 of the instant interlocutory application are permitted to be substituted in place of original petitioner
by carrying out necessary correction in red ink at the relevant place in the writ application. W. P. (S)
No. 2523 of 2010
(3.) THE writ petition has been preferred for payment of the family pension by the widow of late, Dr. Surendra Sinha claiming revision in family pension from the respondents, Government of
Jharkhand. It has been stated in paragraph nos. 8 & 9 of the main writ application that she was
getting only Rs. 4370/ -per month since long, which was required to be revised.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.