JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The appellant has filed this appeal for setting aside the Judgment
of conviction and order of sentence dated 05.04.2006 passed by the
Special Judge, C.B.I.CumAdditional Sessions Judge,XIIIth, Dhanbad in
R.C. No. 16A/01D) whereby the appellant has been convicted for the
offence under Section 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1) (A) and 13(1) (d)
of the Prevention of corruption Act, 1988 and sentenced him to undergo
Rigorous imprisonment of six months under section 7 of P.C. Act and
further sentenced him to undergo imprisonment of one year under
Section 13(2) of P.C. Act. Both the sentences shall run concurrently.
(2.) The prosecution case in brief is that Alijan Mian and Ram Prasad
Sharma filed two separate complaint petitions before the
Superintendent of Police, C.B.I. Dhanbad on 6.11.2001 alleging therein
that the accused appellant, Suresh Prasad Singh had demanded
Rs.100/ from each of them as illegal gratification for delivery of cheque
issued in their favour towards payment of bonus for the year
20002001. Thereafter, the said complaint petition was referred to the
S.I., C.B.I. (P.W.8) for verification. After verification he submitted the
verification report (Ext13) and the complainants were found genuine
and correct. Thereafter, the case was instituted against the appellant
under Section 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1) (A) and 13(1) (d) of the
Prevention of corruption Act, 1988. On taking up the investigation, P.W.9
made arrangement to lay a trap on the aforesaid accused. The office of
the Koyla Nagar Town Administration, BCCL, Dhanbad was contacted
and requested to send two officers/officials to the office of S.P., CBI,
Dhanbad on 06.11.2001 to act as independent witnesses. The Personnel
Manager, KNTA, BCCL, Dhanbad was pleased to depute Narendra Kumar
Sinha, Sr. Technical Superior and Birendra Kumar Lalla, Revenue
Inspector for this purpose. A team of CBI officials was constituted and
the complainants Ali Jan Mian and Ram Prasad Sharma were
introduced to all including the aforesaid independent witnesses. The
procedure for lying the trap and used of chemical powder were
explained to the member of the team by practical demonstration. The
two complainants were asked to produce Rs.100/each as the said
amounts were brought by them to pay the same to the accused Suresh
Prasad Singh as illegal gratification. The numbers of G.C. Notes were
noted in the preliminary memorandum and the said notes were treated
with phenolphthalein powder thereafter, the said notes handed over to
the complainant Alijan Mian and Ram Prasad Sharma for giving the
same to the accused appellant when he will demand the money,
according to the arranged plan. Thereafter, all the team members went
to the office of the accused appellant but at that time as the counter was
closed all them entered through the platform. Alijan and the Ram Prasad
Sharma both the complainants accompanied by the C.B.I. officers,
entered into the office. Thereafter, Ram Prasad Sharma demanded the
cheque from the accused appellant on which the accused appellant
asked as to whether they have brought Rs.100/. On this, both the
complainants handed over the two notes of hundred rupee thereafter the
accused appellant took the signature of the complainants on the pay
sheet and gave them their cheques. The accused appellant kept the
aforesaid notes in the pocket of the shirt, on being signal, the C.B.I.
officers immediately caught hold the appellant and recovered the
aforesaid two currency notes from his pocket. The trap party after doing
due formalities, arrested the accused appellant and the case was
registered against him. After completing the investigation, the charge
sheet was filed against him under the aforesaid sections of the
Prevention of corruption Act, 1998.
(3.) The prosecution has examined ten witnesses to prove the
prosecution case. They are namely P.W.1 Alijan Mian (complainant),
P.W.2 Ram Prasad Sharma (complainant), P.W.3 Birendra Kumar Lala
(shadow witness), P.W.4 Narendra Kumar Sinha (Shadow witness), P.W.5
Neeraj Verma (Sanctioning authority), P.W.6 B.C. Purkait (Expert of
CFSL), P.W.7 Kumar Abu Baker (Senior Divisional Cashier), P.W.8 Rajesh
Kumar Prasad (Verifying officer), P.W.9 Umesh Kumar (I.O.), P.W.10
Ramadhar Mahto and defence has examined two witnesses namely
D.W.1 Radha Prasad Verma, D.W.2 Kaushal Kishore Singh.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.