GULU GUPTA @ KAMAL KISHORE GUPTA Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND
LAWS(JHAR)-2012-8-156
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Decided on August 31,2012

Gulu Gupta @ Kamal Kishore Gupta Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF JHARKHAND Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
(2.) The petitioners are aggrieved by the Judgment dated 25.2.2003 passed by learned 1 st Additional Sessions Judge, Deoghar, in Cr. Appeal No. 11 of 1999 / 108 of 2002, whereby the appeal filed against the Judgment dated 12.2.1999 passed by Shri A. K. Yadav, learned Judicial Magistrate 1 st Class, Madhupur at Deoghar, in G.R. No. 516 of 1995 / T.R. No. 238 of 1999, was dismissed by the Appellate Court below with modification in sentence. It may be stated that the trial Court had found the petitioners guilty for the offence under Sections 341/323/324/326/504/34 of the I.P.C., and had convicted them for the same. Upon hearing on the point of sentence, the Trial Court had denied the privilege of the Probation of Offenders Act to the petitioners and had sentenced them to undergo simple imprisonment for one year each for the offence under Sections 341/323/504/34 of the I.P.C., and further simple imprisonment for two years each for the offence under Section 324/326/34 of the I.P.C. Upon appeal, the learned Appellate Court below set-aside the conviction of the petitioner Jugal Kishore Gupta for the offence under Section 326 of the I.P.C., but maintained his conviction for the other offences and gave him the benefit of Probation of Offenders Act, directing him to enter into the probation bond of Rs.2000/- with two sureties of the like amount each for keeping peace and maintaining good behaviour for a period of two years. The conviction and sentence of the petitioner Gulu Gupta @ Kamal Kishore Gupta was upheld by the learned Appellate Court below.
(3.) From perusal of the lower court records, it appears that petitioners were made accused in Madhupur P.S. Case No.223 of 1995, G.R. No.516 of 1995 for the offence under Section 341/323/324/326/504/34 of the I.P.C., on the allegation that on 8.11.1995, while the informant was teaching the students at his house, both the accused petitioners along with other unknown persons came and assaulted the informant with some pointed object, causing injuries over his right eyebrow.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.