VISHAL PRASAD Vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
LAWS(JHAR)-2012-1-18
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Decided on January 25,2012

Vishal Prasad Appellant
VERSUS
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) ONE Interlocutory Application No. 971 of 2011 was submitted in W.P. (PIL) No. 1872 of 2010. However, on 25.3.2011 in I.A. No. 971 of 2011, an order was passed to convert the I.A. No. 971 of 2011 into contempt petition and therefore, this contempt petition has come before us. The petitioner complained that in spite of the order passed by this Court in W.P. (PIL) No. 5926 of 2009 Suresh Prasad Vrs. The State of Jharkhand and others directing the authorities to remove the encroachment made over or on the property of Zila Parishad, Dhanbad, encroachments have not been removed.
(2.) AFTER registering this contempt petition, this Court observed that there appears to be a tacit consent of the authorities in such illegal activities of continuing encroachment over the public property and therefore, on 20.4.2011, the Registrar General was directed to lodge F.I.R. with the Vigilance Department of the State to investigate the irregularities and illegalities in such matters. That order was clarified by the order dated 12.5.2011 and on 13.07.2011 and the State was directed to submit the status report with respect to the action taken against the unauthorized occupants of the public property situated in the area of Zila Parishad in the State of Jharkhand. Learned Advocate General, who was requested to assist this Court in this Contempt petition, submitted that encroachment over the properties of Zila Parishad in the State of Jharkhand also are covered by a direction issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Jagpal Singh and others Vrs. State of Punjab passed in Civil Appeal No. 1132 of 2011 arising out of S.L.P.(C) No. 3109 of 2011 wherein Hon'ble Supreme Court gave direction to all the State Governments in the Country :hat they should prepare schemes for eviction of illegal/unauthorized occupants of Gram Sabha/Gram Panchayat/Proamboke/Shamlat land and these must be restored to the Gram Sabha/Gram Panchayat for the common use of villagers of the village. For this purpose the Chief Secretaries of all State Governments/Union Territories in India are directed to do the needful, taking the help of other senior officers of the Governments. Therefore, according to learned Advocate General, the State may be submitting the factual position whether the State has submitted compliance report in the Hon'ble Supreme Court in above case.
(3.) BE that as it may, in the High Court of Jharkhand approximately 1592 Civil contempt cases are pending and this figure is as on today i.e. on 25.01.2012. We make it clear that this is the position even when the contempt petitions, if are taken for consideration by the Court wherein reply has been filed and no much time is consumed of the Court in passing appropriate orders and normally the party, in whose favour there is an order, gets relief but even after deciding a large number of contempt matters by the High Court, the pendency of total cases is of 1592, which is certainly not a small issue but it is a big issue. We may state that these matters take not much time for decision provided State takes a stand in time before the matter reaches to the Court for consideration. These matters can be disposed of though within a period of 15 days only by the State at its own level by granting relief to the persons in whose favour judgment has attained finality but we expect that the State Government shall not only concentrate over the matter of deciding these contempt matters but shall also develop mechanism for implementation of the High Court orders and for that purpose, task may be given to one high authority of the Government so appropriate direction may be issued to the concerned Department either to show why the order has not been implemented or to direct its implementation within 15 days from the receipt of the notice of contempt itself and or that, without waiting for the next date of contempt petition, the compliance report may be submitted and the matter may be mentioned to the Court with request that relief has been granted to the contempt petitioner so that those matters may be taken by the Court without waiting for its turn and may be disposed of.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.