BINDESHWAR JHA Vs. STATE OF BIHAR
LAWS(JHAR)-2002-8-56
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Decided on August 06,2002

Bindeshwar Jha Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF BIHAR Respondents

JUDGEMENT

VISHNUDEO NARAYAN, J. - (1.) THIS appeal has been directed by the appellant against the judgment and order dated 4.1.1990 passed in Sessions Trial No. 218 of 1988 by Shri S.K.P. Verma, 7th Additional District Judge, Dhanbad whereby and whereunder the appellant was found guilty for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the I.P.C. and he was convicted and sentenced to undergo R.I. for life.
(2.) THE prosecution case has arisen on the basis of the fardbeyan (Ext. -1) of P.W.1, Dulali Rajwarin, the informant, recorded on 16.9.1985 at 10.30 hours in Chaitudih Colliery Siding; Dhanbad regarding the occurrence which is said to have been taken place on that very day at 9 hours. According to the prosecution case, P.W.1, the informant, was on duty from 8 hours on 16.9.1985 in Chaitudih Siding and Shiv Kumar Singh, the Attendance Clerk, the deceased of this case, was seen from going towards east from west in the said Siding and Nirmala Devi, the mother of the appellant was going towards west from east and thereafter said Shiv Kumar Singh and Nirmala Devi went together talking in the attendance room. It is alleged that after some time i.e. at about 9 A.M., the informant saw the elder son of Nirmala Devi fleeing towards west and Shiv Kumar Singh aforesaid besmeared with blood was found chasing him and in course of chase the said Shiv Kumar Singh fell down. It is also alleged that Nirmala Devi was found fleeing towards north. The prosecution case further is that the informant along with P.W.2, Sumati Nuniyani went to Shiv Kumar Singh who told them that the elder son of Nirmala Devi had fled away after assaulting him by Bhujali and thereafter said Shiv Kumar Singh became unconscious. On alarms several persons including Sitwa Devi and Majid Khan came there and Shiv Kumar Singh was brought to the Central Hospital Tilatand on dumpher but he died in the way to the hospital.
(3.) THE appellant has pleaded not guilty to charge levelled against him and claimed himself to be innocent and to have been falsely implicated in the case. His defence in the alternative is that in exercise of the right of private defence of the person of his mother Nirmala Devi he has assaulted the deceased while he was attempting to commit rape on his mother.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.