JUDGEMENT
S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J. -
(1.) According to petitioner an inspection was carried out in his premises on 7th June, 2002 showing total of 32 K.W. against sanctioned load of 8 K.W. On the basis of the inspection the impugned bill for the month of June, 2000 issued showing energy bill of Rs. 1.25.909/ - under Clause 16.9 of the tariff. In the meantime, the State Electricity Board issued circular on 28th July, 2001 stating that idle and unused plug points should not be included in the assessment of total load.
(2.) The petitioner earlier raised objection against the inspection report vide letter dated 21st July, 2000, the General Manager -cum -Chief Engineer, Ranch! ordered the Electrical Superintending Engineer, Electric Supply Circle, Ranch! on 1st September, 2000 to make a fresh inspection the Electrical Superintending Engineer, in his turn vide letter dated 7th February, 2001 directed the Electrical Executive Engineer, Urban Electric (Supply) Division No. 1, Ranchi to re -inspect the premises of petitioner.
(3.) The grievance of the petitioner is that thereafter no re -inspection of the petitioner's premises has been made in spite of intimation to the Chairman (Tech) Jharkhand State Electricity Board, Ranchi made on 26th March, 2002.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.