SUBODH KUMAR ROY Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT,
LAWS(JHAR)-2011-8-117
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Decided on August 23,2011

Subodh Kumar Roy Appellant
VERSUS
State Of Jharkhand Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Transport, Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Poonam Srivastav, J. - (1.) HEARD counsel for the petitioner.
(2.) DESPITE time having been granted to the State, no counter affidavit has been filed. The instant writ petition is preferred for issuance of an order or direction for permitting the petitioner to ply his vehicle within the State of Bihar since he is a nominee of the said state. The second prayer is for quashing the letter dated 04.07.2007 (Annexure -4 to the writ petition) issued by Respondent No. 3 refusing to countersign on the petitioner's inter State permit for the route Bhagalpur to Mohanpur More, being permit No. P.St.P. 547/97. The ground for refusal is that the petitioner failed to deposit taxes for the period commencing from 15.11.2000.
(3.) THE submission of the petitioner is that since he is a nominee of State of Bihar, he is not liable to pay any taxes to the State of Jharkhand and only countersignature on the permit is required. Since the petitioner holds a permanent permit, he was allowed to ply his vehicle on the route Bhagalpur to Mohanpur More being Bus No. BRV6131 and the same was valid up till 2003, but after the constitution of the State of Jharkhand, the route is now Inter State. A countersignature by the State of Jharkhand is necessary on the permit to enable the vehicle to enter within the bounds of State of Jharkhand. The petitioner was directed by the State Transport Authority, Bihar, to replace his old bus and he has duly complied with the order, after obtaining No Objection Certificate from the Bihar Transport Officer. The petitioner's permit was renewed for a period of five years commencing from 13.03.2003 to 12.03.2008. The order impugned in the instant writ petition is dated 04.07.2007 passed by the Joint Transport Commissioner, Jharkhand. Counsel for the petitioner submits that despite the permit was valid till the year 2008, he was stopped from plying the vehicle at the relevant time, the writ petition was instituted, but on account of its pendency, he continues to face financial loss till date.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.