- (1.) This revision application is maintainable under Section 397 r/w Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(2.) Instant revision application is directed against the order dated 27.10.2010 passed in C.P. Case No. 1075 of 2004 by which learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad observed that there was prima facie material existed against the Petitioners, Manoj Kumar, Smt. Ramni Devi, Mahanand Prasad, Smt. Anita Devi @ Anita Kumari & Arbind Prasad to proceed against them for the alleged offence under Sections 323/341/379/365/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and it was directed by the said order to issue summons.
(3.) Learned Counsel pointed out that a criminal revision was preferred by the opposite party No. 2 against the order dated 27.01.2005 recorded by Shri Radha Krishna, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad in C.P. Case No. 1075 of 2004 by which complaint case was dismissed under Section 203 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by detailed discussion. The impugned order was set aside and direction was made to the court below to issue process against the accused as there were sufficient materials brought by the complainant for issuance of process against them, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No. IV, Dhanbad observed in Cr. Revision No. 54 of 2005. A Cr. Miscellaneous Petition No. 330 of 2007 was preferred by the accused Petitioners under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for setting aside the order recorded in Cr. Revision No. 54 of 2005 by which direction was made to the court below for issuance of the process.;