MOUSAMI NAGESH @ MAUSHMI NAGESH Vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH VIGILANCE
LAWS(JHAR)-2011-1-115
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Decided on January 06,2011

Mousami Nagesh @ Maushmi Nagesh Appellant
VERSUS
The State of Jharkhand through Vigilance Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Prashant Kumar, J. - (1.) ANTICIPATORY bail application filed by Petitioner Mousami Nagesh @ Maushmi Nagesh in connection with Vigilance P.S. Case No. 23 of 2010 ( Special Case No. 23 of 2010) pending in the court of Special Judge, Vigilance, Ranchi is moved by Sri. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate and opposed by Sri. T.N. Verma learned Counsel appearing for the Vigilance Department.
(2.) IT is alleged in the FIR that the Chairman and members of Jharkhand Public Service Commission in connivance with expert of Interview Board and other candidates committed large scale bungling, manipulation, irregularities in the 2nd Civil Service Examination conducted by Jharkhand Public Service Commission and thereby recommended the name of Petitioner and other candidates for appointment in government service. It is submitted by learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner is innocent and he has committed no offence. It is further submitted that the Petitioner is a candidate and she has no access in the office of Jharkhand Public Service Commission, therefore, it is absurd to allege that the Petitioner has made interpolation in the answer sheet. It is further submitted that the Petitioner has no knowledge that any interpolation and/or manipulation made in the answer sheet. It is further submitted that the Petitioner is a deserving candidate and she has been rightly selected by the Jharkhand Public Service Commission, therefore, she is entitled to be released on anticipatory bail.
(3.) ON the other hand, learned Counsel appearing for the Vigilance Department submits that during the investigation interpolation was found on various pages of the answer book of Petitioner relating to subjects General Studies 1st and 2nd part, Labour & Social Welfare 1st and 2nd part and Sociology 1st and 2nd part. The said answer books were sent to Directorate of Forensic Science Laboratory, Gandhi Nagar, Gujrat for examination. It is further submitted that the report of Director of Forensic Science Laboratory reveals that 298 marks raised by aforesaid interpolation. It is submitted that Petitioner is also one of the beneficiaries of criminal conspiracy.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.