ALPANA CHOUDHARY Vs. ALOK KUMAR BANERJEE
LAWS(JHAR)-2011-4-46
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Decided on April 04,2011

Alpana Choudhary Appellant
VERSUS
Alok Kumar Banerjee Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) The instant revision arises from the judgment and Decree of eviction dated 16.11.2009, passed by the Sub Judge 1st Dhanbad in Title (Eviction) Suit No. 45 of 1999 [Alok Kumar Banerjee v. Alpana Choudhary].
(2.) The Suit was instituted on two grounds--arrears of rent amounting to Rs. 2,400/- and on the ground of personal necessity under Section 11(i)(c) of B.B.C. Act. The Plaintiff waived the claim for eviction on the ground of arrears of rent but contested the suit on the ground of personal necessity. The Court below decreed the suit coming to a conclusion that the disputed premises detailed at Schedule-B of the plaint which is a part and parcel of Schedule-A, was required for the personal use of the Plaintiff and landlord.
(3.) The facts of the case is that the property described in Schedule-A of the plaint, situated in Mohalla J.C. Mallik Road was a joint family property of one Dr. Samarendra Nath Chaudhary and his other co-sharers including the husband of the Defendant. There was a partition in the family of Dr. Samarendra Nath Choudhary and other co-sharers of the property described in Schedule-A. Dr. Samarendra Nath Choudhary inherited the property and came in exclusive possession of the same after the death of his father. In course of time, property described in Schedule-A was let out to the tenant namely Deb Shankar Dev alias Gonu and also to the Defendant by Samarendra Nath Chaudhary. The Defendant was inducted as a tenant which is a part of Schedule-A property. He started running a medical shop and paying Rs. 300/-as monthly rent payable in the succeeding month according to the English calender. The Plaintiff entered into an agreement for sale with Dr. Samarendra Nath Chaudhary on 24.05.1993 and constructive possession was also delivered to the Plaintiff as he paid major part of the consideration money. Subsequent thereto, the Defendant started making payment of rent to the Plaintiff on an assurance that he will vacate the Schedule-B property in due course. Finally, a Sale Deed was executed by Dr. Samarendra Nath Chaudhary on 28.05.1999 in favour of Plaintiff with regard to Schedule-A premises. The information about the Sale Deed was also given to the Defendant by the vendor himself. The other tenant--Deb Shankar Dev alias Gonu vacated the premises. However, the Defendant refused to vacate the premises on request of the Plaintiff in the year 1998 and stopped making payment of rent w.e.f. December, 1998.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.