JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for
the State.
(2.) This is an application for grant of regular bail to the petitioner for
the offence under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code.
(3.) It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that Petitioner
was not named in the F.I.R. and subsequently during investigation the
petitioner was arrested along with coaccused
Mukesh Ganjhu and from
the possession of Mukesh Ganjhu some money was recovered which is said
to be looted money and subsequently, police also recovered some articles
on the basis of his confession. It is further submitted that petitioner is in
custody since 04.07.2008 and in this case six witnesses have already been
examined, but they have not supported the case and the coaccused
Mukesh Ganjhu has already been granted bail by a Bench of this Court
vide order dated 17.07.2009 in B. A. No. 4710 of 2009 and as such, he
may be enlarged on bail.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.