JUDGEMENT
Gurusharan Sharma, J. -
(1.) In respect of
Agreement No. F 2-53 of 1979-80 dated
24/5/1979, dispute raised by the contractor
were referred to the Sole Arbitrator who
gave award for payment of a sum of Rs.
1,87,318.75 paise, as principal amount, and
Rs. 1,12,391.00 as interest @ 18 per cent
per annum, i.e. total sum of Rs. 2,99,709.75
paise to the contractor. The said award was
made Rule of the Court by the impugned
judgment and order dated 17.3.1992. The
Court below also granted interest pendente
lite and future till realisation @ 6 per cent
annum.
(2.) The contractor had made altogether
19 items of claims to the tune of Rs.
4,73,653.99 paise. The aforesaid claims
related to refund of security deposits,
refund of amount deducted from on account
bills, value of moorrum not paid, value of
gravel washed away during monsoon in 1991,
consolidation of moorrum and stone broken
materials at quarry, labour advance, carriage
of stone from Group-II to Group-I, price
escalation for labour and materials, estimated profit on balance work, expenditure
of idle labourers, extra travelling, fooding
and lodging, salaries of idle staff, value of
carriage of stone not mentioned in the
agreement, loss and damages for
devaluation etc and interest @ 18 per cent
per annum from 12.3.1983 to 11.7.1986.
The Arbitrator gave an unreasoned award.
(3.) One of the objections raised under
Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, was
that the Arbitrator did not consider the
agreement and his failure to do so amounted
to misconduct on his part. The
measurement book, copies of running bills,
final bill and several other letters from the
department, including counter claim of the
defendants regarding excess payment of
Rs. 23,359.00 to the plaintiff were also not
looked into by the Arbitrator, while passing
the impugned award. It was also not clear
from the award as to which of the items of
claims were allowed and which were
rejected. The grant of interest for the period
of 12.3.1983 to 11.7.1986 as well as interest
pendente lite and future was contrary to law
and against the terms of agreement.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.