JUDGEMENT
M.Y.Eqbal, J. -
(1.) Heard Mr. S.J. Roy,
learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mrs.
Ritu Kumar, learned Counsel for the respondents.
This is an application under Section
11(6)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,
1996 wherein a prayer has been made for
appointment of an independent arbitrator for
reference of dispute for adjudication.
(2.) The petitioner's case, inter alia, is that
he was awarded a contract work by the Superintending
Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Circle, Ranchi and an agreement
was entered into between the parties being
Agreement No. 2452 of 1989-90 and contract was for widening and strengthening of
K.T.K. Road. The petitioner completed the
major portion of the work but due to shortage
of bitumen and road roller, which was to be
supplied by the Road Construction Department, he could
not finish his work. The Department failed to supply materials and other
requirements in spite of reminders an ultimately
the petitioner was forged to stop the work.
The petitioner said to have reminded up to
October 1994. It is stated that final measurement of the work was taken in the month of
November to December 1994 only but the respondents failed to make payment and deleted
some of the claims of the petitioner. The petitioner objected to the said deletion made by
the Executive Engineer. However, the Department informed the petitioner that matter of
objection was under consideration, vide letter
dated 10/12/1996 and 13/12/1997. The
petitioner thereafter came to know from the
lettendated 16/7/1998 and 16/2/1999 that
the Department has not solved the dispute.
(3.) A counter-affidavit has been filed by
the respondents stating, inter alia, that.clause
23 of the Agreement was deleted by the respondents, vide, letter dated 18-11-1992 and
as such, there is no question of appointment
of Arbitrator. It is further stated that as per
Clause 32(1)(c) of the Agreement, the claim is
not admissible for short supply and/or no supply
and/or delay is supply of departmental
materials and/or equipment. Various other
facts have been stated in the counter-affidavit.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.