JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The case of the petitioner is that one late Sarju Thakur,
husband of the petitioner, a permanent employee of M/s. Bharat
Coking Coal Limited died in harness on 15.4.1996, leaving the
petitioner and four minor children. The name of this petitioner and
her two sons does find mentioned in the service excerpt of her
husband prepared in the year 1987. After the death of her
husband, the petitioner applied for compassionate appointment in
terms of clause 9.5.0 of the National Coal Wage Agreement. Upon
completion of all the formalities, Personnel Manager, M/s. Bharat
Coking Coal Limited issued a letter dated 26.3.1998 relating to
appointment of the petitioner on compassionate ground. However,
before the petitioner could be appointed, one Bhunehwari Devi
claiming herself to be legally wedded wife of late Sarju Thakur put
objection on the appointment of the petitioner. Subsequently, the
said Bhunehwari Devi and her children filed Title Suit No.53 of
1998 before the learned Munsif I, Dhanbad for declaration that
they are the legally heirs of late Sarju Thakur. This petitioner was
arrayed as one of the defendants in that suit. In course of the
proceeding, when said Bhunehwari Devi (plaintiff no.1) died, her
name was expunged from the cause title of the case. However,
that suit was decreed in favour of the plaintiffs.
(2.) Being aggrieved with that decree, this petitioner preferred
Title Appeal No.103 of 2004 wherein plaintiffs of the Title Suit as
well as Project Officer were made respondents. While the appeal
was pending for adjudication, the appellant and the respondents
(heirs and legal representatives of the deceased Bhuneshwari
Devi) with the intervention of the common friends got the matter
settled amicably and the terms of compromise were reduced in
writing. Accordingly, Title Appeal was decreed in terms of the
compromise which are as follows:
" (a) Plaintiff/Respondents namely, Geeta Devi and
Memini Kumari shall be entitled to receive half of all
service benefits of late Sarju Thakur including P.F.,
Gratuity etc. while the remaining half of the service
benefits will go to the defendants/ Appellant Gulwanti
Devi.
(b) If need arises both the parties shall execute
other and further documents to carry aforesaid terms
of apportionment of service benefits into effect.
(c) As regards compassionate employment, if any
provided by employer BCCL to Gulwanti Devi, the
plaintiff/Respondents shall have no objection to it."
After the decree was passed, the petitioner filed a
representation praying therein to allow her to join her duties but
the Project Officer, Dhansar Industry Colliery, respondent no.3
rejected the representation on the ground that terms and
conditions incorporated in the compromise petition are not binding
upon the Bharat Coking Coal Limited.
(3.) Being aggrieved with that order dated 11.6.2008 as
contained in Annexure 3, this writ application has been filed for its
quashing and also for a direction to the respondent to allow the
petitioner to join her duties.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that
though the petitioner is not the first wife of the deceased employee
but name of this petitioner and her children were there in the
service excerpt of the deceased employee and that in terms of the
compromise arrived at in between the parties, the petitioner is to
be given employment by the Bharat Coking Coal Limited, who was
also party to the suit as well as the appeal and in whose presence
the Title Appeal was decreed in terms of compromise and hence,
the Bharat Coking Coal Limited can be said to have acknowledged
the terms of the compromise as signature has been put by the
counsel appearing for the Bharat Coking Coal Limited on the
compromise petition filed before the court and under this situation,
the respondent-Bharat Coking Coal Limited cannot deny
appointment to the petitioner on the plea that the petitioner is the
second wife of the deceased employee when the appeal had been
decreed in terms of compromise whereby it had been agreed by
the parties that this petitioner is to be given employment by the
Bharat Coking Coal Limited.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.