JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Mrs. Ritu Kumar, appearing for the petitioner submitted that
petitioner has not been given benefits of A.C.P. and has not been
paid House Rent Allowances in spite of representation.
Counsel for the State submitted that she has received
Statement of Facts to the effect that after final bifurcation of the
cadre, petitioner joined Jharkhand State on 24.12.2007 and that
the office order contained in memo No. 4034 dated 24.12.2008 is
pending consideration before the Finance Department, Govt. of
Jharkhand for examining and giving concurrence; and after
concurrence, the claim of petitioner for A.C.P. will be considered;
and that the representation of petitioner for House Rent
Allowance will also be considered by the Department.
Let a copy of the instructions sent to the State counsel by
way of statement of fact, be kept on the record.
(2.) In view of such stand taken by the State, petitioner is
permitted to file a fresh representation before the Secretary-Cum-
Commissioner, Finance Department, Government of Jharkhand,
Ranchi and the Director, Provident Fund Directorate, Finance
Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi (Respondents
No. 2 and 3 respectively) with regard to his claim of promotions
under A.C.P. scheme.
(3.) If petitioner is found entitled to his claims, the same should
be given to him. If petitioner is found not entitled to any claim/part
of it, the reasons thereof should be communicated to him. This
exercise should be completed within three months from the date
of receipt of such representation.
It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits
of the claims of the petitioner.
With these observations and directions, this writ petition
stands disposed of.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.