JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Heard.
(2.) It is submitted that petitioner has retired in 2007 but nothing has been paid to him on account of retiral dues, inspite of repeated requests.
(3.) Counsel for the State submitted that in absence of instruction, he is not in a position to accept or controvert the statements made in the writ petition. However, the matter can be looked into.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.