JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Through this writ application the order dated 14.12.2004
passed in Vigilance case no.51 of 1995 (Special Case no.12 of
1995) under which cognizance of the offence was taken against
the petitioner has been sought to be quashed and at the same
time, the order granting sanction for prosecution against the
petitioner by the Secretary-cum-Legal Remembrancer, Government
of Jharkhand has also been sought to be quashed.
(2.) The facts giving rise this application are that one Kamlesh
Kumar, the then Superintendent of Police, Vigilance Investigation
Bureau, Bihar, Patna on holding preliminary enquiry came to the
conclusion, prima facie, that in the year 1989-90, 1990-91 and
1991-92, one Vijay Kant Sahay, the then Divisional Forest Officer,
Social Forestry Division, Latehar in conspiracy with other officials of
the Forest Department including the petitioner have shown to have
received 5% Aldrine manufactured of Nacil Company worth
Rs.3,97,000/-from the suppliers, namely, Bhumi Vikas Kendra, Ratu
Road, Ranchi but, in fact, the said material had never been
purchased, still it was shown to have been purchased from a nonexistent
firm by making forgery in the relevant documents and
thereby the accused persons caused the State exchequer to a
great loss. Having come to that conclusion, the said Kamlesh
Kumar, the then Superintendent of police submitted a written
report, upon which Vigilance case no.51 of 1995 (Special Case
no.12 of 1995) was registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471,
409, 201, 109 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and also under
Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of
Corruption Act against 13 named accused persons including the
petitioner.
(3.) The vigilance after investigating the case did find the
allegation, prima facie, to be true against the accused persons
including the petitioner and submitted its report on 9.12.2004 after
obtaining the order of sanction for the prosecution against the
public servants including the petitioner. Upon which learned Special
Judge, Vigilance, Ranchi, vide its order dated 14.12.2004 took
cognizance of the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468. 471, 409,
109 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and also under Section
13(2) readwith Section13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Being aggrieved with the said order, this writ application has
been filed praying therein to quash the order taking cognizance and
also the order under which sanction for prosecution was accorded
by the Secretary-cum-Legal Remembrancer, State of Jharkhand
against the petitioner.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.