JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Heard.
(2.) It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the
respondents have not paid the admissible dues for the work done on
26.1.2009. It is further submitted that such claim is not time barred.
(3.) Learned Advocate General submitted that in absence of
instruction and counter affidavit, he is not in a position to accept or
controvert the statements made in the writ petition.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.