JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner, Goldi Madhyan is
moved by Sri Rajiv Ranjan learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri
T.N. Verma learned Additional P.P.
(2.) From perusal of first information report I find that Public Analyst
has not found any adulteration in the sample of Kaju Barfi, whereas in the
sample of Rasgulla, he found presence of cereal starch. Admittedly, same is not
injurious to health. It is also not alleged that petitioner was preparing and selling
Rasgulla made of only cheese.
(3.) Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, I allow this
application and direct the petitioner, above named, to surrender in the court
below by 11th of January 2011. If petitioner surrenders by that time, the learned
Court below is directed to enlarge him on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pakur in connection
with O.C.R. Case No. 35 of 2010 subject to the condition laid down under
Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.