JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Heard counsel for the parties.
(2.) The petitioner's grievance in this writ application is against the
appointment of Respondent No. 6 as a Para Teacher in a quite illegal and
arbitrary manner.
(3.) The grounds of the petitioner's claim is that, though the petitioner was
one of the candidates aspiring for his appointment, but in a most illegal and
arbitrary manner, the Respondent No. 6 has been appointed. The further
grievance of the petitioner is that against the appointment of the Respondent
No. 6, a representation was made to the Respondent No. 2- the Deputy
Commissioner, Giridih, but the same has not been considered. It is sought to
be explained that the main objection as raised by the petitioner is that on the
date of his appointment, the Respondent No. 6 was not eligible for his
appointment as Para Teacher, in as much as, he was granted license under
Bihar Unification of License Order, 1998 for trading in kerosene oil.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.