JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for
the State.
(2.) This is an application for grant of regular bail to the petitioner for
the offence under Sections 419/420/467/468/470/471/120B/384 of the
Indian Penal Code.
(3.) It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that as per the
F.I.R. the main accused is Tuka Ram Namdeo, who has taken money for
providing employment in the Railway Department. Apart from him other
named accused persons are Karan Nagley, Ajay Kumar Dubey, Indra Bhan
Choudhary and Sunil Kumar Hathiya. It is further submitted by learned
counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and
subsequently, his name was included by the statement of some other
witnesses and the named accused persons namely Tuka Ram Namdeo has
been granted bail by a Bench of this court vide order dated 12.01.2009 in
B. A. No. 1155 of 2008. Petitioner is in custody since 31.07.2010.
Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail, but
admits that named accused person has already been granted bail.
In the facts and circumstances of the case and since, named
accused has already been granted bail, petitioner, above named, is directed
to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/(
Rupees Ten
Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad in connection with Dhanbad
G.R.P.S. Case No. 69 of 2007 corresponding to G. R. Case No. 124 of 2007,
subject to the condition that one of the bailers should be the local residents
having property within the jurisdiction of the court.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.