JUDGEMENT
M.K.ABDULLA SONA, J. -
(1.)THIS appeal is preferred from the order dated 31.12.1998 passed by CDRF, Malappuram in OP No. 246/1998.
(2.)THE appellant is the complainant in the above OP filed against respondent opposite parties for claiming compensation on the ground of
deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party in the delay of
delivery of the telegram by the opposite parties to the complainant in
connection with the death of the complainants son. The opposite parties
appeared and denied and disputed the deficiency of service. The version
filed by the opposite parties and they contended that the above disputed
telegram could not be delivered as the address furnishing the telegram
was incorrect and incomplete. As per the address given the addressee is a
resident of Vadakkekara house in the delivery area of Ponnani Head Post
Office. As the addressee could not be located, the telegram remained
undelivered. According to the opposite parties they are not responsible
for the late delivery and they have not committed any negligence on their
part and they are not liable for payment of any compensation as prayed in
the OP. The complainant has examined as PW1 and for the part of the
complainant Ext. P1 to P5 (documents) were marked. In this case the
Postal Assistant of Ponnani Post Office was examined as DW1 and only one
document was marked from the part of the opposite party as Ex. R1. The
counsel for the complainant and the representative of the opposite
parties were heard in the forum below and after evaluating all the
available evidence and the submissions from both sides. The forum below
dismissed the complaint. Aggrieved by the said order the present appeal
is filed by the complainant.
(3.)WHEN this appeal was taken up for hearing, both parties referred and argued the case based on the ground urged in the memorandum
of the present appeal.
The point for decision is solely whether there is any deficiency in service in the delivery of the telegram to the complainant
in time and if it is so, what compensation can be entitled.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.