JUDGEMENT
Arun Madan, J. -
(1.) This civil first appeal
has been preferred under, Section 96, CPC,
by appellant (defendant) against the judgment
and decree dated 10.3.1997 passed by the
learned Additional District Judge, No. 7. Jaipur
City, Jaipur in civil suit No. 46/88 whereby
suit for specific performance filed by respondent (plaintiff) has been decreed deciding ail
issues in his favour and against the defendant.
(2.) The facts giving rise to the filing of this
appeal briefly stated, are that the plaintiff (respondent) filed a suit for specific performance
of an agreement of sale (Ex. 1) alleged to have
been executed between plaintiff and defendant
on 27.2.1982 with respect to a plot of land
bearing No. A/16 situated in Janta Colony,
Jaipur City. The plaintiff averred in the plaint
that the defendant (appellant) had agreed to
sell his plot in dispute for a sale consideration
of Rs. 2 lacs, for which the plaintiff had given
him an advance payment of Rs. 25,000/- by
way of earnest money at the time of execution
of sale agreement (Ex.1). As per conditions of
the sale agreement (Ex. 10), the defendant was
required to obtain 'No Objection Certificate'
from income tax department within two
months of its execution, as well as 'no due
certificate' for repayment of loan of Rs.
15,000/- to the Collector Jaipur and thereafter to furnish receipts in lieu thereof before
execution of a sale deed in performance of
sale agreement (Ex. 1).
(3.) The plaintiff further alleged that since
the defendant did not perform his part of obligations to the conditions under the sale agreement (Ex.1), a notice dated 20.9.1982 was
served upon him through an Advocate to get
the sale deed executed but since the defendant did not execute sale deed, he, (plaintiff)
had no option but to file the present suit to get
enforced specific performance of sale agreement (Ex. 10).;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.