JUDGEMENT
R.R.Yadav, J. -
(1.) Heard.
(2.) Perused the order impugned dated
2.4.1999 refusing the prayer of the tenant-
defendant revisionists to examine Refeeq
Mohd. and Madan Lal Singhvi, who were
present in Court, as witnesses on their behalf
on the ground that the nmes of these witnesses
were not mentioned in the list of witnesses required to be filed under
Order 16 sub-rule (1) of Rule 1, CPC and no reason was
disclosed in the application by the revisionists
as to why they failed to include the names of
the aforesaid witnesses in the list of witnesses
to enable the Court to give permission to
examine these witnesses under sub-rule (3) of
Rule 1of Order 16, CPC
(3.) Although the present revision petition
is posted today for admission but with the consent
of learned Counsel for the parties it is
finally disposed of.on merits.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.