JUDGEMENT
V.S. Dave, J. -
(1.) This appeal is directed by four accused-appellants against the judgment of learned Sessions Judge, Jaipur District, Jaipur, dated 18.9.1980 convicting and sentencing the accused-appellant as under:
JUDGEMENT_86_LAWS(RAJ)7_19891.html
(2.) Brief facts giving rise to this case are that an F.I.R. Ex. P. 70 numbered 16/77 was taken down by Superintendent of Police, C.B.I. (S.P.E.), Jaipur, Shri B.P. Bhatnagar wherein it was alleged that on receipt of a source information a preliminary enquiry No. 22/76 was conducted in the office and the facts which were collected during the preliminary enquiry, were verified and it transpired from them that Serva Shri S.D. Gangwani Stores Officer and K. Lallan senior A.S.K. and J.S.D. Raisinghani Accountant H.M.T., Unit 6, Ajmer, while working therein entered into a criminal conspiracy with one Motilal owner and driver of vehicle R.J.X. 1121 to cheat H.M.T. Unit 6 by way of claiming false L.T.C. on the basis of fake documents. In pursuance of the said criminal conspiracy it was alleged that Serva Shri Gangwani, Lallan and Raisinghani obtained L.T.C. advance of Rs. 2828/-, 1418/- and 3181/- respectively during the year 1975 under pretext to undertake journey from Ajmer to Kanyakumari and back in between 16.10.75 to 4.11.75 along with their family members. It was alleged that infact they never went to Kanyakumari and in conspiracy with the driver prepared fake bills and cheated the department. On these facts case under Ss. 120B read with S. 420, 420 IPC and 5(2) read with S. 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, was registered and investigation was handed over to one Inspector Sunderlal.
(3.) During the course of investigation accused S. D. Gangwani, Stores Officer was tendered pardon and made approver. After investigation a charge-sheet was submitted against four persons, namely, C.H. Logani, J.S.D. Rai Singhani, N. K. Lallan and Govind Jamtani. It was alleged in the charge sheet that all these persons were entitled for L.T.C. (leave travel concession) to whom time onward and to any place in India once in a block of four years. According to this scheme employees were to pay fare of first four hundred kms. on outward journey and last 400 kms. On inward journey from their own pocket and rest is to be paid by the department. The aforesaid four accused, it was alleged, declared that they intended to avail L.T.C. facility Ex Ajmer to Kanyakumari and back and obtained leave from 20.10.75 to 4.11.75 and Gangawani, Rai Singhani and Lallan obtained advance of Rs. 2200/-, 2800/- and 1100/- respectively. Logani and Jhamtani however, did not take advances. All the five accused hired a mini bus RJX 1121 belonging to Motilal and undertook journey to various places. They first visited Jaipur, then Delhi and Amritsar. Jammu, Srinagar, Gulmarg, Hardwar, Agra, Indore, Aurangabad, Poone, Bombay and Ahmedabad. They however, did not visit Kanyakumari. But after their return they submitted their respective claims, they entered into criminal conspiracy, cheated the administration by claiming L.T.C. bills showing false visit to Kanyakumari for the purpose of causing pecuniary advantage to themselves and causing loss to H.M.T. by charging more amount than they were entitled. According to the charge-sheet they were only entitled to charge from Ajmer to Gulmarg and back. They however submitted the claims showing travel to Kanyakumari and thus also made false documents. S D. Gangwani was made an approver and Shri Motilal a witness and charge-sheet was submitted against remaining four, namely, C.H. Logani, J.S.D. Rai Singhani, N. K. Lalla and Govind Jamtani for offence under Ss. 120B read with S. 420, 468/471 IPC before Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, C.B.I., Jaipur District, Jaipur. He committed the accused to Sessions for trial.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.