JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Appellant has filed this appeal, challenging the award dated 11.10.2017 passed by the Motor Accident Claims
Tribunal, seeking enhancement of compensation amount.
(2.) Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the Tribunal has erred in taking the disability of the
appellant as 50%, whereas, permanent disability of the
appellant had been determined as 60% vide disability
certificate Exhibit-14. Compensation had not been granted
to the appellant towards loss of future prospects. Hence,
the compensation amount granted by the Tribunal was
liable to be enhanced.
(3.) Learned counsel for respondent no. 3, has opposed the appeal.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.