JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This petition has been filed with the prayer to quash and set aside the impugned letter dated 29.7.2019 requiring
certain deposits and Bank Guarantees as also post dated cheques
as per the conditions of the NIT dated 13.6.2019 for collection of
toll tax where the petitioner's bid had been accepted and inter-alia
direct the respondents to provide reasonable time to the petitioner
for depositing requisite payments as per the bid. It has been
further prayed that the respondents be directed not to award the
tender for collection of toll tax under the NIT dated 13.6.2019 to
any other contractor for which the petitioner alone is entitled
being the highest bidder.
(2.) Mr. Sandeep Singh Shekhawat, counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondents issued an E-NIT dated
13.6.2019 for collection of toll tax on Bundi Bijoliya Section of Khatkar Bundi Bijoliya Road (hereafter 'the Road") for 2 years with
reserve price of Rs. 233.50 lakh. He submitted that when the NIT
was notified the road was incomplete and the participants in the
bidding process were orally informed that the road under
construction would be completed prior to execution of the contract
in favour of the highest bidder. The petitioner participated in the
bidding process and being the highest bidder was declared
successful. Consequent to which the impugned
letter dated 29.7.2019 followed. Mr. Sandeep Singh Shekhawat
submitted that, albeit the petitioner has been awarded the
contract for toll collection but the road is still incomplete, as a
result of which vehicles are not being plied on the road. The grant
of the contract for collection of toll on such a road is presently a
futility which will only entail the petitioner's obligation to deposit
amounts under the impugned letter and further render it
vulnerable to huge financial obligations without the contracted
recompense. It has been submitted that vide the impugned letter
dated 29.7.2019, the petitioner is to deposit one installment for
the above toll collection contract @ 8% of the bid amount i.e. Rs.
22,48,889/- plus TCS @ 2% amounting to Rs. 44,978/-, aggregating to a sum of Rs. 22,93,867/- by Demand Draft and
Performance Bank Guarantee @ 15% of the Bid Amount i.e. Rs.
42,16,667/- from Nationalized Bank within ten days i.e. by 8.8.2019 aside of depositing 23 post dated cheques against remainder 23 monthly installments covering the bid amount. Non
compliance will entail cancellation of the bid and forfeiture of
earnest money amount. Hence till the road on which toll is to be
collected is complete, it be directed that the petitioner be
protected and the respondents be directed not to make any unjust
arbitrary demand as under the impugned letter dated 29.7.2019.
(3.) Mr. VP Mathur, counsel for the respondents submitted that following the impugned letter dated 29.7.2019, an agreement
dated 31.7.2019 was executed by the petitioner with the
Rajasthan State Road Development and Construction Corporation
(RSRDCC). The petition is therefore infructuous. As per clause 9 of
the said Agreement dated 31.7.2019, the petitioner if aggrieved of
the working of the contract for collection of toll on the road in
issue on any count, including the road allegedly being incomplete
in breach of the respondent's obligation, the petitioner is required
to approach the Empowered Standing Committee for resolution of
the dispute arising therefrom. Instead of approaching the
Empowered Standing Committee, the petitioner seeks to ill-
advisedly pursue his grievance in respect of a matter of pure
contract before this Court. In the circumstance, the writ petition is
not maintainable and to be dismissed - moreso it agitates a pure
question of fact in the realm of a contractual dispute without any
iota of public law element. On the falsity of the petitioner's claim,
it has been submitted that in fact traffic is regularly plying on the
road in question without obstruction. The road, for which the
petitioner's bid for collection of toll was accepted is complete
except for a portion of only 800 mtrs. pertaining to a minor bridge
alongwith its approaches in respect of which an alternate
motorable bye pass has been made whereon the traffic is plying
regularly without any obstruction. There is no obstruction to the
collection of toll.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.