JUDGEMENT
PANKAJ BHANDARI, J -
(1.) Petitioner has filed this fourth bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.
(2.) F.I.R. No.347/2017 was registered at Police Station Anti- Corruption Bureau, Jaipur (Choki Alwar) for offence under Sections
7, 8/ 13 (1) (D) and 13 (2) of Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 and Section 384 & 120-B of IPC.
(3.) In "Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal versus Union of India and Anr. 2003 (2) SCC 45, Apex Court has held that lawyers have no right to go on strike or to give a call for boycott of Courts. Calls given
by Bar Association or Bar Council for such purpose cannot require
the Court to adjourn the matters. In "Krishnakant Tamrakar
Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh" decided by the Apex Court
on 28.3.2018. The Apex Court has held that strike by advocates is
in violation of law laid down by the Apex Court and the same
tantamounts to contempt. The Apex Court has further held that
the office bearers are liable to be removed from the office for
passing resolution for strike. In view of the judgment of Apex
Court in Ex.Captain Harish Uppal Vs. Union of India and
"Krishnakant Tamrakar Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh",
since the advocates are abstaining from work, this Court deems it
proper to pass order on merits.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.