JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) In this miscellaneous appeal filed under
Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation
Act, 1923, the petitioners are challenging the
award of the Commissioner, Workmen
Compensation, Sriganganagar dated April 4,
2005 passed in Compensation Case No.
43/1992, whereby, award of Rs. 63,920/- by
way of compensation, Rs. 31,960/-by way of
penalty and Rs. 19,176/- by way of interest was
passed by the Commissioner, Workmen
Compensation, Sriganganagar in favour of the
claimant respondent Smt. Paramjeet Kaur.
(2.) Brief facts of the case are that a claim
was filed by the sole respondent Smt. Paramjeet
Kaur wd/o Santosh Singh wherein, it was stated
that husband of the claimant was an employee
of the Punjab National Bank and was
transferred to Suratgarh from his earlier place of
posting at Ranauli (district Sikar). Deceased
Santosh Singh was relieved from Ranauli in the
afternoon of October 16, 1990 wherefrom he
reported at the R.M. Office, Sriganganagar.
Further, he was directed to join duty at the
Branch Suratgarh on October 20, 1990. The
deceased joined duty at Suratgarh the very day
at 1.00 p.m. which is evident from the TA/DA
paid to him by the Bank.
(3.) It is stated that Suratgarh is a place
situated 75 km. distant from Sriganganagar and,
after joining duty, deceased-Santosh Singh
stayed at Sriganganagar from October 21, 1990
onwards. On October 30, 1990, however, while
travelling from Sriganganagar to Suratgarh,
deceased met with an accident and died.
Therefore, after his death in the said accident,
claim was filed by his widow before the
Commissioner, Workmen Compensation,
Sriganganagar under the Workmen's
Compensation Act, 1923.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.