JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) In this revision petition, the
petitioner is challenging order dated 6-5-2009
passed by the Addl. Distrcit Judge, Parbatsar,
whereby, the said Court dismissed the application filed by the petitioner defendant under
Order VII Rule 11, read with Section 151,
C.P.C. in Civil Original Suit No. 11/2009 pending before the Addl. District Judge, Parbatsar.
(2.) According to brief facts of the case, the
respondent-plaintiffs preferred suit for declaration and permanent injunction, in which, the
plaintiffs prayed that order dated. 13-2-2009
passed by the Mining Engineer, Makrana in
exercise of powers conferred under Rajasthan
Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1986 may
be quashed. After filing aforesaid civil suit,
the respondent-plaintiffs also preferred a revision petition before the State Government viz.,
Deputy Secretary, Mines under Rule 47 of the
Rules of 1986 against the same order. That
revision petition was dismissed by the Deputy
Secretary, Mines vide order dated 2-3-2009.
(3.) In the civil suit before the Addl. District
Judge, Parbatsar. petitioner-defendant filed
application under Order VII, Rule 11, C.P.C.
submitting that the civil suit is not maintainable on the ground that the same is based upon
agreement which is void under the mining law
and, further, the same is not maintainable in
view of Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act.
It is also pleaded that respondent-plaintiffs have
already sought remedy under Rule 47 of the
Rules of 1986 by way of filing revision petition and, that, too, has been rejected by the
State Government, therefore, the suit is not
maintainable.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.