POONAM CHAND PANCHARIYA Vs. JUDGE, INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES TRIBUNAL AND LABOUR
LAWS(RAJ)-2009-2-128
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Decided on February 17,2009

Poonam Chand Panchariya Appellant
VERSUS
Judge, Industrial Disputes Tribunal And Labour Respondents

JUDGEMENT

H.R. Panwar, J. - (1.) BY order dt. 25.01.2008 notice was issued to the respondent. Despite service of notice, the respondent RSRTC failed to appear and therefore, by order dt. 13.08.2008 notice for final disposal at the admission stage was directed to be issued and notice in pursuance thereof has been served as per office report dt. 05.02.2009. However, no one appears for the respondent RSRTC.
(2.) HEARD learned Counsel for the petitioner. By the instant writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the Award Annex.1 dt. 11.01.2001 has been challenged by the petitioner.
(3.) IT is contended by learned Counsel for the petitioner that the Appropriate Government made a reference by notification dt. 20.04.1999 to the respondent Industrial Disputes Tribunal and Labour Court, Jodhpur (for short 'the Labour Court' hereinafter). The Labour Court by the award impugned made a "No Dispute Award". According to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, there is no word like "No Dispute" in the Industrial Disputes Act. It was incumbent on the Labour Court to have answered the reference either way. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has relied on a Division Bench decision of this Court in Pappu Ram v. The Labour Court, Jodhpur and Ors. reported in, 2005 (3) W.L.C. (Raj.) 616 wherein the Division Bench of this Court held that a Tribunal cannot answer an award made by appropriate Government under Section 10 (1) (c) in the name of no industrial dispute award. The reference proceedings dos not abate even on the death of workman what to talk of absence of workman. Thus, it is obligatory on a Labour Court or a Tribunal to answer a reference made under Section 10 (1) (c) on merit after proper adjudication. It is for the Tribunal to evolve its own procedure in conformity with the rules and exercise the power vested with it to make an award on the basis of material available on record. The Court or the Tribunal with a view to settle the industrial dispute keeping in mind the sense of doing complete justice to the parties concerned, may obtain additional material, if so required.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.