JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This miscellaneous appeal is directed against order dated
4.6.09 passed by the Family Court,Jodhpur in Case No. 9/08 ,
whereby an application preferred by the appellant u/s 25 of the
Guardianship & Wards Act, 1890( in short the Act of 1890
hereinafter) has been ordered to be returned for want of
jurisdiction.
(2.) The appellant entered into marriage with the respondent
on 29.5.2001. Out of the wedlock , they have two sons namely,
Sanni and Hitesh. A matrimonial dispute between the parties
resulted in a consent decree of divorce . The custody of the
children remained with the respondent who had taken them
from Jodhpur to Hanumangarh , where she is staying with her
parents .
(3.) The appellant preferred an application u/s 25 of the Act of
1890 for the custody of the children before the Family
Court,Jodhpur. However, the respondent had already preferred
an application before District Judge, Hanumangarh for appointing
her guardian of the children. In this view of the matter, an
application u/s 10 of CPC was filed on behalf of the respondent
before the Family Court,Jodhpur for stay of the proceedings
instituted on the application of the appellant. It was inter alia
contended on behalf of the respondent before the Family Court
that the minor children of the parties are ordinarily residing at
Hanumangarh and presently, they are studying at Jaipur
therefore, in view of provisions of Section 9, the Family
Court,Jodhpur has no jurisdiction to entertain the application
preferred by the appellant.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.