JUDGEMENT
ASOPA, J. -
(1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
(2.) Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the experience
of the petitioner has not been considered while considering his case for
selection to the post of Probodhak for the reason that the departmental
representative was not present in the selection process. He further submits
that teaching experience for the purpose of direct recruitment gained in the
supervisory capacity in any recognized educational institution has to be taken
into consideration as per the definition of "teaching experience" given in the
first part of Rule (2k) of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Prabodhak Service
Rules, 2008, the second part of same Rule (2k) relating to "service" or
"experience" gained after regular selection is applicable in case of promotion.
Therefore, definition of service or experience given in second part is not
applicable in case of interpreting the term experience in case of direct
recruitment.
(3.) Before proceeding further, Rule 2(k) of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj
Prabodhak Services Rules, 2008 reads as under:-
"2(k) "Teaching Experience" for the purpose of direct recruitment
includes the experience gained in supervisory capacity in any
recognised educational institution of project;
"Service" or "Experience" wherever prescribed in these rules as a
condition for promotion from one service to another or within the
Service from one category to another or to senior posts, in the case of
a person holding a lower post eligible for promotion to higher post
shall include the period for which the person has continuously worked
on such lower post after regular selection in accordance with rules
promulgated.";
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.