JUDGEMENT
P.C.Jain, J. -
(1.) The defendant-petitioners has
filed this revision petition under
Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
against the order dated 26.4.1997 passed by
the learned-Additional District Judge No. 1,
Sriganganagar whereby the order dated
4.8.1993 dismissing the appeal as abated was
set aside and quashed and the Legal
Representatives of deceased Babulal were ordered
to be taken on record. .
(2.) I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the parties and have very carefully,
gone through the record of the case.
(3.) The brief facts of the case are that non-petitioner Jagga Bali filed an appeal against
the judgment and decree passed by the learned
Trial Court dated 12.11.1991 in Civil Suit No.
47 of 1988, which was registered as Civil
Appeal No. 3 of 1992. 'During the pendency
of the appeal, petitioner Babulal expired on
22.1.1993 and on failure to implead the Legal
Representatives of deceased-petitioner Babulal
on record within the statutory period of 90
days, the appeal stood automatically abated.
For such an abatement, no formal order of
the Court is necessary. However, the Court
passed an order of abatement of the appeal
on 4.8.1993 and by the same order rejected
the application of the appellant, who is non-petitioner in
this case under, Order XXII, Rule-4, CPC
as the same was held to have been
filed beyond the period of limitation prescribed
by the law.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.