URMILA DEVI (SMT.) Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS
LAWS(RAJ)-2018-3-231
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Decided on March 22,2018

Urmila Devi (Smt.) Appellant
VERSUS
State of Rajasthan And Others Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) By this writ petition, a challenge is made to the validity of Rule 2(c) of the Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependants of Deceased Government Servants Rules, 1996 (for short "the Rules of 1996"). It is on the ground that the married daughter has not been included in the definition of "dependent" given under Rule 2(c) of the Rules of 1996.
(2.) Before referring to the issue for challenge to the validity of Rule 2(c) of the Rules of 1996, it would be gainful to narrate the facts of this case. The petitioner made an application for compassionate appointment on the death of her mother. The petitioner's father died much before the death of her mother. The writ petition has been filed without showing that petitioner was dependant on the deceased-mother. It is also not stated that her husband is not working elsewhere or doing any job/business thus has no means of livelihood. The application for compassionate appointment has yet been filed. It has already been settled by the Apex Court that compassionate appointment cannot be taken to be means of recruitment. It is in the case of LIC v. Asha Ramchandra Ambekar, reported in (1994) 2 SCC 718 and in Umesh Nagpal v. State of Haryana, reported in (1994) 4 SCC 138 . The purpose of compassionate appointment has also been specified. It is to give financial support to a family whose only bread-earner dies.
(3.) In the present case, the deceased-mother alone was in the family. There is no averment in the writ petition that petitioner was dependent on her. Taking into consideration the aforesaid, even if the question of validity of the rule is examined and accepted so as to include married daughter in the definition of "dependent" given under Rule 2(c) of the Rules of 1996, the petitioner would not yet be entitled to get compassionate appointment. It is looking to other conditions given in the definition of "dependent". For ready reference, Rule 2(c) of the Rules of 1996 is quoted hereunder: "2(c) "Dependent" means a spouse, son, unmarried daughter or widowed daughter, adopted son/adopted unmarried daughter legally adopted by the deceased Government servant during his/her life-time and who were wholly dependent on the deceased Government servant at the time of his/her death.";


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.