P.K.LOHRA, J. - (1.) Accused-petitioner has preferred this revision petition under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. to challenge judgement dated 02.07.2011 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge No.2, Sri Ganganagar (for short, 'learned appellate Court'), whereby learned appellate Court has confirmed judgement dated 26.03.2009, rendered by Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sri Ganganagar (for short, 'learned trial Court'). The learned trial Court, by its verdict dated 26.03.2009, indicted accused-petitioner for offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short, 'Act') and handed down sentence of four months' simple imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs. 60,000/-. Being aggrieved by the same, petitioner approached learned appellate Court but his that effort did not fructify to his advantage and the learned appellate Court dismissed his appeal. This sort of situation has necessitated filing of this revision petition.
(2.) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now rival parties have sorted out their dispute and compromise has been arrived at. With this positive assertion, learned counsel has urged that both the impugned judgements be annulled and sentence handed down by learned trial Court and confirmed by learned appellate Court be set aside.
(3.) Learned Public Prosecutor on the other hand submits that although offence under Section 138 of the Act is compoundable but after verdict of learned appellate Court, it may not be appropriate to grant indulgence to the petitioner.;