KUMAR PRINCE S/O SUKHRAM B/C NAYAK Vs. PUSHPA W/O KUMAR PRINCE
LAWS(RAJ)-2018-1-167
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Decided on January 22,2018

Kumar Prince S/O Sukhram B/C Nayak Appellant
VERSUS
Pushpa W/O Kumar Prince Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) D.B.Civil Misc. Application No.1688/2017 : There is a delay of 83 days in filing the appeal. For the reasons stated in the application seeking delay to be condoned, the same is condoned. The application is allowed. D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 4334 / 2017: The appellant was not complying with an order passed in favour of the respondent granting interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. As a consequence thereof, in the absence of the appellant petition seeking decree for divorce filed by the appellant has been dismissed.
(2.) Now, for not complying with the order under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 petition seeking divorce requires to be adjourned sine die till compliance is made but cannot be dismissed.
(3.) Learned Counsel for the respondent states that the impugned order is a composite order noting non-appearance as one reason to dismiss the petition and non-compliance with the order under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 as the second reason.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.