JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner,
learned counsel for private respondent and also
learned counsel for Jaipur Municipal Corporation,
Jaipur.
(2.) This P.I.L. application was filed
highlighting encroachment made by respondent No.2 upon
the land of the Jaipur Municipal Corporation.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for
the petitioner that for unauthorized occupation of
respondent No.2, the matter was highlighted before the
Municipal Corporation and the Municipal Corporation in
its turn came out with an order that certain
encroachments have been made upon the land of the
Corporation in the year 1997 but thereafter no action
is being taken by the Municipal Corporation to remove
the encroacher i.e. the respondent No.2 from the land
of the Corporation. It appears that virtually, this
P.I.L. was filed to execute the order passed by the
Corporation.
(3.) Learned counsel appearing for the Municipal
Corporation submitted that they are looking into the
matter and no sooner the land is identified to be of
the Corporation, necessary action shall be taken
against the persons who have encroached upon the same.
Learned counsel appearing for respondent
No.2 at the same time submitted that he is in
possession of the land in question since pre
Independence and he has constructed his factory,
residential house and some shops and some of the shops
have been let out to the Municipal Corporation.
Learned counsel further submits that he had already
produced proofs in regard to the land in question
before the Collector of Jaipur in the year 1967 and he
was virtually recognized to be the owner of the land
in question.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.