GOVIND B. CHOUDHARY Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR.
LAWS(RAJ)-2008-1-126
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Decided on January 03,2008

Govind B. Choudhary Appellant
VERSUS
State Of Rajasthan And Anr. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Prakash Tatia, J. - (1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the parties.
(2.) BRIEF facts of the case are that the petitioner purchased one agriculture land and got it converted from agriculture to non -agricultural purposes, namely, in this case for establishing a petrol pump. According to the petitioner, for this, he applied in accordance with law for conversion of land and before passing the order of conversion, notices were issued to the local body as well as to various State Departments including to Public Works Department. A public notice inviting any objection was also issued before converting the land from agriculture to land for petrol pump use. Thereafter, the petitioner obtained No Objection Certificate (NOC) under Petroleum Rules, 2002 from the District Collector, Pali for establishing the petrol pump under the provisions of Petroleum Rules, 2002 on 24.02.2005. The petitioner thereafter without any reason and basis was served with the order of the District Magistrate dt. 04.05.2005 by which the NOC dt. 24.02.2005 for establishing the petrol pump was suspended. The petitioner being aggrieved against said order passed by the District Collector, Pali has preferred the writ petition. According to learned Counsel for the petitioner, the District Magistrate had no jurisdiction under the Rules of 2002 to suspend the NOC and as per Rule 150, NOC can be cancelled if the allottee commits default as enumerated in Rule 150 of the Rules of 2002. In the present case, there is no allegation against the petitioner which falls under Rule 150. It is submitted that the order was passed without affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and further no reason has been given except that objection has been raised by one TCI Infrastructures Ltd. and thereafter objection was raised by Executive Engineer, PWD, Pali which is dt. 27.04.2005.
(3.) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order is void abinitio as has been passed without affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The order is non -speaking order and further the order is wholly without jurisdiction as the District Collector had no power to suspend the NOC.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.