JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THIS is defendant -tenant's second appeal in a suit for arrears of rent and ejectment.
(2.) THE case of the plaintiff is that defendant was a tenant in the suit premises on a monthly rent of Rs. 20/ -. He committed default in payment of rent and, therefore, the suit was filed on 14 -9 -1973 by the plaintiff being suit No. 55/73 on the ground of default in payment of rent for 25 months. Since the defendant deposited the arrears of rent under Section 13(4) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, l950, (here in after to be referred as 'Rent Control Act') the suit was dismissed on 28 -6 -1978. It is alleged in the plaint that the defendant paid rent only upto May, 1978 and did not pay any rent thereafter. The present suit was filed on 24 -3 -1979 on the ground of default in payment of rent for nine months and also on the ground of reasonable and bonafide necessity.
On service of the plaint, the defendant filed an application under Section 13(4) of the Rent Control Act to the effect that he was willing to deposit rent from 1st June, 1978 to 31st August, 1979 along with interest. After issuing notice of this application to the plaintiff the court ordered on 24 -8 -1979 that the defendant might deposit rent and hence, the arrears of rent were deposited by the defendant.
(3.) THE suit was contested by the defendant. It was submitted that the earlier suit was also filed with an ulterior motive of getting the rent increased and after dismissal of the suit, the plaintiff stopped accepting rent from the defendant and. therefore, defendant sent money orders to the plaintiff which were also refused. Therefore, the defendant did not commit any default in payment of rent. It was further asserted that there was no reasonable and bonafide necessity for getting the premises vacated.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.