JUDGEMENT
DINESH CHANDRA SOMANI,J. -
(1.) The instant D.B. criminal appeal under section 374(2) of Cr.P.C., 1973 has been preferred by the accused/appellant Ramhet S/o Sobran Singh against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 20/11/2006 passed by Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No. 2, Dholpur in Sessions Case No. 154/2005, whereby the appellant has been convicted and sentenced as under:-
JUDGEMENT_251_LAWS(RAJ)2_2017_1.html
(2.) All the substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently.
(3.) Prosecution story in brief is that on 31/07/2005, at about 5:10 PM, the complainant Smt. Guddi W/o Maharaj Singh, by Caste Kushwah R/o Chhattu Ka Pura, Police Station Kolari, District Dholpur submitted a written report (Ex.D-3) to SHO, Police Station Sadar Dholpur, District Dholpur stating therein that on 21/06/2005 at about 5:00 PM, her husband Shri Maharaj Singh went for taking medicines to Sirmohar at Manpuriya Ka Pura and remained there in the evening. On next day when Sirmohar and Maharaj Singh were going to Dholpur, then Ramhet Kushwah R/o Saimare Ka Pura came there and asked Sirmohar to stay at home and said that he would accompany Maharaj Singh in taking the medicines and since that day, the whereabouts of Maharaj Singh are not known. After about 8-10, days Ramhet and Gaj Singh came to her house and enquired about Maharaj Singh and when she told them that Maharaj Singh has not returned till then, Ramhet and Gaj Singh asked her that if she gives them Rs. 2,00,000/- in cash, they will bring Maharaj Singh at home. The complainant told them that she is not having cash of Rs. 2,00,000/- and how she will pay. The complainant further stated in written report (Ex.D-3) that after 8- 10 days, she took 'Village Panchayat' to Saimare Ka Pura. Ramhet was not there, but his inmates Godna, Nihala and Shobha Ram assured her that they would sent Maharaj Singh to her home after two days, but since then her husband has not returned. She suspected that Ramhet and Gaj Singh have kidnapped Maharaj Singh and prayed to help the informant. The complainant also stated that she was searching her husband in relations, here and there but failed.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.