JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This criminal misc. petition under section 482, CrPC has been filed by the petitioners being aggrieved with the order dated
23.03.2012 passed by Sessions Judge, Pali (for short 'the revisional court' hereinafter) in Cr. Revision No.25/2011, whereby
the revision petition filed by the petitioner No.1 has been
dismissed. The said revision petition was preferred by the
petitioner No.1 against the order dated 13.11.2010 passed by the
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Communal Riots), Pali (for
short 'the trial court' hereinafter) in Cr. Original Case
No.515/2010, whereby it took cognizance against the petitioners
for the offences punishable under sections 447 and 427, IPC and
summoned them.
(2.) Brief facts of the case are that respondent No.2 filed a complaint against the petitioners to the effect that he has
purchased a plot No.17 through registered sale-deed from
petitioner No.2. The said plot is situated in Khasra No.128, which
was the Khatedari land of petitioner No.2. It is alleged that
thereafter the petitioner No.2 filed a revenue suit for declaration
and injunction in the revenue court and the summons of said suit
was served upon respondent No.2 on 18.04.2001. Then the
respondent No.2 visited the disputed plot and found that
petitioners have taken possession of the said plot of him and other
plots of various persons and they also destroyed the boundary
marks on the said plots. It is also alleged that at the site 4-5
notorious type of persons were standing. It is further alleged that
respondent No.2 came to know that as a highway is being
proposed from the said land, the petitioner No.2, with the
intention to grab the land for getting compensation, took the
possession of the said land illegally, though the same was sold to
the respondent No.2 and other persons and destroyed the
boundary marks of the said plots and also erected some
temporary hut-mates and filed the revenue suit before the
revenue court. It is also alleged that the petitioner No.1
threatened the respondent No.2 with dire consequences.
(3.) The complaint of the respondent No.2 was forwarded by the trial court for investigation to the Police Station, Sadar, Pali,
where FIR No.68/2001 was registered, however, the police after
investigation filed a negative final report while concluding that the
dispute between the petitioners and the respondent No.2 is purely
of civil nature.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.