JAGDISH PRASAD TANWAR SON OF SHRI LAXMAN SINGH TANWAR Vs. KASTURI DEVI WIFE OF JAGDISH PRASAD TANWAR
LAWS(RAJ)-2017-8-83
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Decided on August 04,2017

Jagdish Prasad Tanwar Son Of Shri Laxman Singh Tanwar Appellant
VERSUS
Kasturi Devi Wife Of Jagdish Prasad Tanwar Respondents

JUDGEMENT

ASHOK KUMAR GAUR,J. - (1.) The present appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 19.02.2008 passed by the Family Court, Ajmer wherein divorce petition filed by the appellant-husband has been dismissed.
(2.) Briefly stated facts of the case are that the appellant got married to respondent-Kasturi Devi as per Hindu rites on 10.12.1993. The appellant filed an application under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking a decree of divorce against his wife-respondent on 19.01.2004. The appellant pleaded in his application that after his marriage on 10.12.1993, the respondent wife stayed with him for two years of their marriage and she was working as Nurse in Jahawarlal Nehru Hospital, Ajmer and she used to go to her parents house very frequently. It was alleged that the respondent-wife had left the matrimonial home on 22.05.1998 and she was living separately from last 5 years on her own. It was pleaded in the application that the respondent filed a criminal case against the appellant and his three sisters for offence under Section 498A I.P.C. registered at P.S. Mahila Thana, Ajmer by lodging FIR No. 120/1998.
(3.) The police had filed charge-sheet against the appellant and his three sisters and the court of Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Ajmer tried the criminal case against all of them and one of the sister of the appellant, Smt. Nathi, could not bear the shock of being arrested and prosecuted fell sick and ultimately died on 11.05.2001 and her husband also died on 14.05.2001. In the criminal case, all the three sisters of the appellant were acquitted vide judgment dated 30.10.2002 but the appellant was convicted and sentenced for 2 years' simple imprisonment and fine of Rs. 1000/-. It was alleged that on conviction of the appellant, the respondent-wife distributed sweets and celebrated like an occasion. The appellant filed appeal against his conviction order dated 30.10.2002 before the Sessions Judge, Ajmer and appeal was accepted and he was acquitted of the criminal offence vide judgment dated 24.02.003. The appellant pleaded that had his criminal appeal not been accepted, he would have been terminated being an employee of Indian Railways. The appellant pleaded that he suffered mental agony and pain on account of the rude behaviour of the respondent and it was not possible to live with the respondent-wife any more. The appellant also pleaded that she has deserted him without cause and is entitled to seek a decree of divorce.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.