HARAK LAL Vs. MANAK CHAND
LAWS(RAJ)-2007-1-114
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Decided on January 03,2007

Harak Lal Appellant
VERSUS
MANAK CHAND Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Prakash Tatia, J. - (1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the appellant.
(2.) THE appellant/plaintiff is aggrieved against the judgment and decree dated 26.7.2004 passed by the First Appellate Court reversing the judgment and decree of the trial Court dated 17.11.2003 and dismissed the suit of the plaintiff. According to the plaintiff/appellant, the First Appellate Court committed serious error of law in reversing the judgment and decree of the trial Court because of the reason that the First Appellate Court considered other accommodations of the plaintiff which were in fact residential and could not have been used for commercial purposes by the appellant/plaintiff.
(3.) I have considered the submissions of learned Counsel for the appellant and perused the reasons given by the First Appellate Court as well as the facts of the case.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.