JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) By this application the applicant seeks to appoint independent Abitral
Tribunal under Sections 11(6) of the Arbitrtion and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short
'the Act').
(2.) It is averred by the applicant that on
December 31, 2003 a partnership deed was
executed by the applicant and the respondent for the purpose of running bore-well
digging business. Clause 13 of the said deed
that related to Arbitration, reads as under :-
"That any dispute or difference which may
arise between the partners or between their
representatives with regard to the constitution, meaning,
effect of this deed or any part
or respecting account, profit and loss of the
business or right and liabilities of partner
under this deed or on the dissolution or
winding up of the business or ay other matter
relating to the partnership profession
shall be referred to arbitration and all the
provisions of the Indian Arbitration Aet shall apply."
(3.) After having borrowed loan from City
Corporation Finance Ltd., two trucks were
purchased and machineries got installed by
the firm. However with mutual consent of
partners the firm was dissolved on August
26, 2005. A decision was arrived at between
the partners that the respondent will sell
the trucks and machineries and repay outstanding loan amount.
The remaining sale proceeds will thereafter be divided equally
between the partners. The respondent however did not sell the
trucks and machineries but started his own bore-well business
and had been earning sum of Rs. two lacs
per month. The applicant served notice on
the respondent for doing the needful but all
went in vain. Ultimately vide legal notices
dated March 6. 2006 and April 8, 2006 the
respondent was asked to propose the name
of the Arbitrator to settle the dispute but
the notices remained unresponded.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.