JUDGEMENT
Rajesh Balia, J. -
(1.) AN application had been moved under Section 10/11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as the Fire Policy agreement between the applicant and the respondent -Insurance Company contained an arbitration Clause that in case any dispute arises in respect of claim, the matter may be referred to the Arbitrator.
(2.) THE parties having failed to appoint an arbitrator in terms of the agreement in respect of which the applicant having sent a notice under Section 11 calling upon the respondents to act in accordance with the arbitration agreement by referring the dispute to the arbitrator, an application was moved under Section 11 of the Act of 1996 before the District Court, Sriganganagar. However, considering the decision of Supreme Court in S.B.P. & Co. v. Patel Engineering Ltd. and Ors. reported in, DNJ (S.C.) 2005 957 that the Chief Justice s designate under Section 11 cannot be a District Judge and has to be a sitting High Court Judge, the application was transmitted to the High Court to be decided by the Chief Justice or his designate.
(3.) THE deficiency in the requisite fees for consideration of the aforesaid application has been made good by the applicant.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.