JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This appeal, on behalf of
three accused-persons, namely, (1) Ram
Kishan s/o Pokar Ram, (2) Rohtash alias
Pappu s/o Pokar Ram, and (3) Smt. Savita,
w/o Babu Lal, is directed against the impugned
judgment and order dated 19-4-2004, passed by the Additional Sessions
Judge (Fast Track), Behror, District Alwar,
in Sessions Case No. 82/2003 (46/2003),
whereby the learned trial Court, while acquitting
accused-appellants from the offence
under Section 302/34, IPC, and appellant
Ram Kishan from the offence under Section
4/25 of the Arms Act, convicted and sentenced
the appellants under Section 304/34, IPC to undergo 10 years rigorous
imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 2,000/- each;
in default of payment of fine, each of the
accused to further undergo three months
additional simple imprisonment.
(2.) Briefly stated, the facts of the appeal
are that on 3-7-2003 P.W. 13 Prakash Singh,
the nephew of deceased Bhopal, lodged a
written-report (Exhibit P-19) at police station Shahajahapur, wherein it was
mentioned that on 2-7-2003, at about 10-11 p.m.
Savita w/o Babulal came at the residence
of Bhopal, s/o Bholuram; he was also
present at his house. She told Bhopal to go
with her as she wanted to ask him about
her husband Babulal, Bhopal went with her.
At about 12.00 in night, they heard that
Bhopal was crying; upon hearing hue and
cry he, his mother Vimla, Rajbala, w/o
Bhopal and Mamta, d/o Bhopal, went at the
residence of Savita; they saw that Savita,
Ram Kishan and Rohtash were inflicting
injuries on the person of Bhopal by sickle
('dantli' - a sharp-edged-weapon), lathis'
and kicks and fists. They intervened and
stopped them from further beating to
Bhopal. Thereafter they took Bhopal to hospital but,
on the way itself, he died. On the
basis of this information, FIR No. 140/2003
(Exhibit P-20) was registered under Sections
323, 302/34, IPC.
(3.) After com pletion of investigation, the
police filed a challan against all the three
accused-persons. The trial Court framed
charge against accused Rohtash and Savita
under Section 302 read with Section 34, IPC
and against accused Ram Kishan under
Section 302 read with Section 34, IPC, and
under Section 4/25 of the Arms Act. The
accused-persons denied the charge and
claimed trial.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.