JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The present criminal revision
petition under Section 397 r/w Section 401,
Cr. P.C. is preferred by the accused-petitioner against the order dated 22-9-2006
passed by the District & Sessions Judge,
Bunch, whereby he allowed the application
under Section 439(2), Cr. P.C. filed by the
State through Public Prosecutor and
quashed and set-aside the bail order dated
14-6-2006 passed by the Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Bundi and directed the trial
Court to issue arrest warrant against the
accused-petitioner in Criminal Case No.
416/2006 arising out of FIR No. 110/2006,
registered at P.S. Kotwal, Bundi for the offences under Sections 420 and 406, IPC.
(2.) Brief facts of the case are that the
accused-petitioner was arrested on 8-3-2006
during the course of investigation for the
offence under Sections 420 and 406, IPC.
On 8-65-2006 the petitioner moved an application under
Section 167(2), Cr. P.C. before
the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bundi for bail
and the same was allowed by the Court below on 14-6-2006. The bail was granted to
the accused-petitioner on the ground that
the prosecution has failed to submit the
charge-sheet within the stipulated period.
During trial the learned Public Prosecutor
filed an application for cancellation of bail
under Section 439(2), Cr. P.C. and the same
was allowed vide order dated 22-9-2006
passed by the learned District & Sessions
Judge, Bundi.
(3.) The said order dated 22-9-2006
passed by the District and Sessions Judge,
Bundi is challenged by the petitioner in this
revision petition on the ground that the petitioner was arrested on 8-3-2006 and the
challan was required to be filed on or before
8-5-2006. Admittedly, the challan has been
filed on 6-6-2006 i.e. beyond expiry of stipulated period, thereforer, the application
moved on behalf of the accused-petitioner
under Section 167(2), Cr. P.C. has rightly
been allowed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bundi vide its order dated 14-6-2006.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.