JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. PRAHLADI DEVI AND OTHERS
LAWS(RAJ)-1996-7-106
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Decided on July 04,1996

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Appellant
VERSUS
Prahladi Devi And Others Respondents

JUDGEMENT

A.P. Ravani, J. - (1.) This Appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge in SB Civil First Appeal No. 115/1972, which arose out of reference case No. 69/1970 decided on March 25, 1972 by the Court of Civil Judge, Jaipur City, Jaipur.
(2.) Proceedings for acquisition of land situated in village Bhojpura and chak-Sudarshanpura, belonging to the respondent herein, were initiated at the instance of Secretary, Urban Improvement Trust, Jaipur. The purpose for which the acquisition proceedings were initiated, was planned development of Jaipur City. On May 13, 1960, Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was issued. Thereafter declaration under Section 6 was made on May 3, 1971. After following the procedure laid down under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short the Act'), the Land Acquisition Officer passed award dated January 9, 1964 for Rs. 18,594/- as against the claim of Rs. 1,50,575/-. The amount of compensation of Rs. 18,594/- was awarded as per the following details - Rs. 15, 450/- compensation for chahi land measuring 5 bighas 3 biswa @ Rs. 3,000/- - Rs. 540/- compensation for ghair-mumkin rasta and ghair-mumkin dhora - Rs. 1,708/- for pumping set The respondent-claimants were not satisfied with the amount awarded. Hence they prayed for reference under Section 18 of the Act. Reference was made to Civil Judge, Jaipur City, Jaipur. The Court after recording evidence and after hearing the parties, passed judgment and order dated march 25, 1972 and rejected the claim made by the claimants. Thus the award passed by the Land Acquisition Officer was confirmed by the Court.
(3.) The respondent-claimants filed appeal as provided under Section 54 of the Act before learned Single Judge of this Court and the following three points were raised -That the market value of the land at the rate of Rs. 3,000/- per b aha, - 1p, awarded by the learned Civil Judge is grossly inadequate; -That solatium at the rate of 10% on the market value in consideration of compulsory nature of acquisition should have been awarded to the claimants; and -That the interest on the amount of compensation should also be added The learned Single Judge enhanced compensation for land at the rate of Rs. 4000/- per Bigha. As far as enhanced amount of compensation at the rate of Rs. 4,000/- per bigha instead of Rs. 3,000/- per bigha is concerned, the learned Single Judge relied upon decision in another Appeal No. 60/1/70 of this Court. In that case, value of the land was assessed at Rs. 4,000/-. In view of this position, the learned Judge was satisfied that the amount of compensation for the land should be awarded at the rate of Rs. 4,000/- per bigha instead of Rs. 3,000/- per bigha.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.