DEEPAK MAHESHWARI,J. - (1.) Heard learned counsel for both the sides on the application filed under Section 100 (5) read with Section 151 CPC as also the application filed under Order 6, Rule 16 read with Section 151 CPC moved on behalf of the appellant on 13.7.2016.
(2.) The said application filed under Section 100 (5) of CPC was contested by the respondent No.1 by filing a reply on 16.8.2016 wherein the objections were raised inter alia, that the proposed substantial question of law are highly misconceived, misleading and suggested just to unnecessarily drag this matter for long.
(3.) Objecting to various parts of the reply to this application, appellants moved another application under Order 6, Rule 16 CPC for striking out the allegedly scandalous, unnecessary and frivolous parts of the reply.;